<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Follow Attribute</title>
	<atom:link href="http://centuryhouse.net/no-follow-attribute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://centuryhouse.net/no-follow-attribute/</link>
	<description>SEO company. We offer Search Engine Optimization to obtain high rankings with Google, Yahoo, and MSN</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 15:35:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO</title>
		<link>http://centuryhouse.net/no-follow-attribute/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centuryhouse.net/?p=151#comment-120</guid>
		<description>I agree that it is stingy, but that will only be a conflict if the person&#039;s SEO strategy is to obtain backlinks from 3way linking or reciprocal linking. 99.9% of my backlinks on all my websites are one way linking, and never paid for a backlink.
For noobs they need to do this form of linking, but for you &amp; me we can survive w/out it.

I do use blogroll links or outbound links with dofollow when I&#039;m pointing to a major website (on new sites). I believe it helps Google identify what type of website you have when you do this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it is stingy, but that will only be a conflict if the person&#8217;s SEO strategy is to obtain backlinks from 3way linking or reciprocal linking. 99.9% of my backlinks on all my websites are one way linking, and never paid for a backlink.<br />
For noobs they need to do this form of linking, but for you &amp; me we can survive w/out it.</p>
<p>I do use blogroll links or outbound links with dofollow when I&#8217;m pointing to a major website (on new sites). I believe it helps Google identify what type of website you have when you do this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ephricon</title>
		<link>http://centuryhouse.net/no-follow-attribute/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Ephricon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centuryhouse.net/?p=151#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Blogroll links - these links should have no follow attributes as well unless you actually want to pass juice to another website.

God forbid you do that!!!  I agree that you don&#039;t want to lose juice, but at the same point being too stingy makes acquiring links more difficult b/c you aren&#039;t participating in the community as much as if you do share the link love, when its deserved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogroll links &#8211; these links should have no follow attributes as well unless you actually want to pass juice to another website.</p>
<p>God forbid you do that!!!  I agree that you don&#8217;t want to lose juice, but at the same point being too stingy makes acquiring links more difficult b/c you aren&#8217;t participating in the community as much as if you do share the link love, when its deserved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
