<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Assume the position&#8230;you fit the description!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://centuryhouse.net/seo-profiling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://centuryhouse.net/seo-profiling/</link>
	<description>SEO company. We offer Search Engine Optimization to obtain high rankings with Google, Yahoo, and MSN</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 15:35:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayush Kumar</title>
		<link>http://centuryhouse.net/seo-profiling/#comment-3574</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayush Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centuryhouse.net/?p=334#comment-3574</guid>
		<description>Thanks for new idea about the new Google Algorithm. I think getting back links form the client site is not a bad idea but off course if that website is penalized due to some reason then it will surely effect on your website too.

Thanks again for sharing this arcticle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for new idea about the new Google Algorithm. I think getting back links form the client site is not a bad idea but off course if that website is penalized due to some reason then it will surely effect on your website too.</p>
<p>Thanks again for sharing this arcticle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO</title>
		<link>http://centuryhouse.net/seo-profiling/#comment-2533</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centuryhouse.net/?p=334#comment-2533</guid>
		<description>Guidelines change all the time, and Google seems to adjust their algo for each domain. I believe they also penalize sites that never had the intention to try to circumvent the guidelines. I dont believe a lot of tactics are bad except those that are malicious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guidelines change all the time, and Google seems to adjust their algo for each domain. I believe they also penalize sites that never had the intention to try to circumvent the guidelines. I dont believe a lot of tactics are bad except those that are malicious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewis</title>
		<link>http://centuryhouse.net/seo-profiling/#comment-2206</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centuryhouse.net/?p=334#comment-2206</guid>
		<description>Is there really such a thing as a truely white hat SEO?

I mean lets face it we all spend all day every day looking for ways to improve our customers ranking. Any time we undertake an activity to increase our sites ranking in the serps (that doesn&#039;t include gaining editorial links) then we are at best wearing a greyish white hat. It always makes be chuckle when I see proclaimed white hats hunting down links, exchanging links submiting to directories etc. Are these tactics really white hat??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there really such a thing as a truely white hat SEO?</p>
<p>I mean lets face it we all spend all day every day looking for ways to improve our customers ranking. Any time we undertake an activity to increase our sites ranking in the serps (that doesn&#8217;t include gaining editorial links) then we are at best wearing a greyish white hat. It always makes be chuckle when I see proclaimed white hats hunting down links, exchanging links submiting to directories etc. Are these tactics really white hat??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO</title>
		<link>http://centuryhouse.net/seo-profiling/#comment-2173</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centuryhouse.net/?p=334#comment-2173</guid>
		<description>G didn&#039;t become a registrar to register new domains. They obviously want to keep tabs on others. There are many points that shows that they&#039;re more of a business than a search engine. I haven&#039;t had much problems with the SERPs except for when I post something like this. I would normally prefer to post it on another site so I wont have big brother watching me :) It&#039;s when you have a lot of ppl stand up for what&#039;s right is when the governing body changes the rules. If nobody stands up, then they&#039;ll continue to do as they please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G didn&#8217;t become a registrar to register new domains. They obviously want to keep tabs on others. There are many points that shows that they&#8217;re more of a business than a search engine. I haven&#8217;t had much problems with the SERPs except for when I post something like this. I would normally prefer to post it on another site so I wont have big brother watching me <img src='http://centuryhouse.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  It&#8217;s when you have a lot of ppl stand up for what&#8217;s right is when the governing body changes the rules. If nobody stands up, then they&#8217;ll continue to do as they please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Smith</title>
		<link>http://centuryhouse.net/seo-profiling/#comment-2167</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centuryhouse.net/?p=334#comment-2167</guid>
		<description>Sounds like some pretty heavy accusations here. I know we obviously are not on the good side of Big G, and they are after all a corporation with their own interests in mind. But perhaps, perhaps we are all taking ourselves a bit too serious here. 

Provocative points, I just wonder how it all will shake out in the end. I guess the SERPs will be the final judge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like some pretty heavy accusations here. I know we obviously are not on the good side of Big G, and they are after all a corporation with their own interests in mind. But perhaps, perhaps we are all taking ourselves a bit too serious here. </p>
<p>Provocative points, I just wonder how it all will shake out in the end. I guess the SERPs will be the final judge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
